(P1) ' ' … Drew Houston understands that this is vital information. Not. Although to be finishing the graduation, I did not have none disciplines that it contemplated methodologies of work with pupils PNEE, and same if had, I do not believe that one or two you discipline come to enable somebody to offer quality education. I am not cogitating the creation of a destined licenciatura the formation of pupils PNEE, but a qualification of the type after-graduation would be the best form of the professor to be able to receive in its classroom pupils with these characteristics and not to be of white hair, without knowing what fazer' '. (P2) ' ' … Acho that not. Because in the college we were not prepared to work thus in groups. It would be important that in the courses of licenciaturas they were offered you discipline practical and theoreticians, to be able to argue the theories and after that to apply them in the practical one.
Thus really we would only be enabled to take care of to this public (pupils PNEE) ' '. (P3) ' ' … No' '. (P4) We can perceive that one interviewed did not justify, while the others three had cited the responsible university as main for this unpreparedness in what it says respect to the teaching work with PNEE. They cite the necessity of discipline practical so that they could not only argue as well as to live deeply the subject. In relation to the question, that approaches the importance of the quarrel of this subject in the academic life of the citizens of the research, we can perceive that all find a quarrel important on the inclusion of PNEE in the regular net of education, similar of that one better teaching formation makes possible them. This concern is evidenced in it speaks of P3 that says: ' ' … Would be important that in the licenciatura courses they were offered you discipline practical and theoreticians, to be able to argue the theories and after that to apply them in practises.