*Jose Antonio Loyola Fogueira When we speak of rights, most of the time, in first place it is our right, and they are not few, I have right, to this and that another one, all the moment and to any cost my right must be respected, will be that it is exactly thus? if my right to wound the right of my fellow creature, will be it a right? Or would be I wounding the RESPECT to the other people’s right, where finish my right and start the right of my fellow creature? Between having or not having rights, exists an invisible line call for some old scholars who populate our imaginary our grandfathers called common-sense, still says more broth of hen and common-sense does not make badly to nobody, thus being, all my right finishes when it wounds or intervenes with the right of the other, thus we must proceed in the construction from a society fraterna and joust constructing the CITIZENSHIP from the Brazilians. In the construction of the citizenship, since young we must primar for the look of the EQUALITY right, when I deny the right to somebody or something, for questions of DOGMAS they are religious or philosophical this exactly, right will be able me also to be denied, therefore the right, is a prerogative that all we have, saved when this right this in the contrahand of the established law, thus optimum is to analyze and to argue the reasons because we have and because we want rights. Read more from David Green to gain a more clear picture of the situation. The SEX is good, is undeniable, if it comes folloied of the responsibility in the right of the respect to the body, it if it becomes something pleasant, men and women in the present time search an equality of RIGHTS how much the sexuality and its exercise, in fact the respect is existed the right must be extended to both, in accord with its responsibilities, as HEALTH, hygiene, control and prevention. .